Objectives Of Corporate Financial Management-Some Views

There is a multiplicity of targets of administration. Wealth maximization is a wholesome goal. Maximization of financial gain, profitability, liquidity and solvency are other targets. But these are sectional and fragmented. Equally, minimization of expense of capital, hazard and dilution of command address certain features. Well, all these put together throw significantly mild on the entire gamut of administration as such. Now, maximization of economic price is additional to the listing of targets of administration.

Further more extra, the goal of the administration really should be to obtain the objective of the corporate proprietors, who are the suppliers of capital, particularly shareholders. The finance manager’s function is not to fulfill his have aims, which may incorporate better salaries, earning popularity or preserving and advancing his private ability and status. It is, fairly, to the extent manager is effective in this Endeavour, and he will also obtain his private aims. It is frequently agreed that the monetary objective of the organization really should be the maximization of owner’s wealth.

However, there is disagreement as to how the economic welfare of proprietors can be maximized. Two effectively acknowledged and commonly talked over criteria which are put forth for this function are: (a) financial gain maximizations, and (b) wealth maximization.


Usually, the business has been deemed as an economic establishment and financial gain has come to be recognized as a rationally legitimate criterion of measuring performance. In guidance of this competition, the next arguments are commonly put ahead:

(i) Revenue is a key motive or most important incentive which paves the way for much better and extra productive performance. It is a reward for entrepreneurial capability. People or groups of persons compete with a single a further and work tricky in buy to excel other individuals in giving much better and extra productive performance merely for the reason that they are captivated toward earning extra and extra financial gain. This promotes enterprising spirit and qualified prospects to economic growth of the society.

(ii) Revenue is not only an objective, but also a criterion or measuring-rod of productive administration. In this way it is the two a goal as effectively as a evaluate of great performance. The degree of achievement or failure more than a period of time can be examined on the foundation of the degree of profitability in a company.

(iii) All business selections are taken maintaining in view their possible effect on financial gain. Hence, it has grow to be a aspect of the choice-building approach.

(iv) In a society or in a business organization productive allocation of scarce resources and their judicious utilization are achievable on the foundation of financial gain criterion. Resources movement from low successful ventures to substantial successful ventures.

(v) In a society which is devoid of financial gain motive or incentive, there will be no area left for mutual   competition   to excel a single a further in performance,   skill   and competence. In such a situation the tempo of development and progress is bound to gradual down.

Limits: As a goal, nonetheless, financial gain maximization suffers from certain fundamental weaknesses: (one) It is vague, (two) it is a short-run position of view, (3) it ignores hazard, and (four) it ignores the timing of returns. An unambiguous meaning of the financial gain maximization objective is neither available nor achievable. It is fairly quite difficult to know about the next: Does it signify short-expression revenue or extended-expression revenue? Does it refer to financial gain before or just after tax? Does it refer to whole revenue or financial gain for every share? Other than it is being ambiguous, the financial gain maximization objective requires a short-run position of view. Prof. Ducker and Prof. Galbraith contradict the theory of financial gain maximization and observe that unique notice on financial gain maximization misdirects professionals to the position where they may endanger the survival of the business. Prof. Galbraith offers the next factors to argue his line of reasoning: (one) it undermines the long run for today’s financial gain (two) it short-improvements research advertising and other investments (3) it may shy absent from ‘any capital expenditure that may improve the invested capital base in opposition to which revenue are based mostly, and the end result is unsafe obsolescence of gear. In other terms, the professionals are directed into the worst practices of administration. Hazard and timing factors are also ignored by this objective. The streams of advantages may possess unique levels of certainty and uncertainty. Two firms may have similar whole anticipated earnings, but if the earnings of a single organization fluctuate considerably as in contrast to the other, it will be extra risky. Also, it does not make a difference in between returns obtained in unique time durations, i.e., it offers no thought to the time price of funds and price advantages obtained these days and advantages just after six months or a single calendar year.

For the reasons supplied previously mentioned the financial gain maximization objective cannot be taken as the objective of administration. It can be stated that the suitable operational-choice criterion really should incorporate: (i) It ought to be precise   and   correct,   (ii)   It   should   consider both   quality   and   quantity dimension, (iii) It really should be based mostly on the greater and the much better principle, and (iv) It really should acknowledge the time price of funds. For these reasons, wealth (price) maximization has changed financial gain maximization as an operational criterion for administration selections.

Take into account the case in point of a few business units building revenue more than a few yrs supplied under

12 months

Unit – one

Unit – two

Unit – 3




















From the previously mentioned desk, it is very clear that all the business units building revenue of six lakh rupees.  But evidently unit – two is the very best of a few, adopted by unit – one and unit – 3. For this reason financial gain maximization is not recognized as a flawless goal, given that it may well direct to unfair means adopted and time price of funds is not deemed.


The maximization of wealth is a extra practical objective of administration. The similar objective, if expressed in other terms, would convey the concept of net current truly worth maximization. Any action which results in wealth or which has a net current truly worth is a attractive a single and really should be undertaken. Wealth of the organization is mirrored in the maximization of the current price of the organization i.e., the current truly worth of the organization. This price may be readily calculated if the company has shares that are held by the public, for the reason that the sector selling price of the share is indicative of the price of the company. And to a shareholder, the expression ‘wealth’ is mirrored in the amount of his recent dividends   and the sector selling price of share.

Ezra Solomon has outlined wealth maximization objective in the next way: “The gross current truly worth of a system of action is equivalent to the capitalized price of the movement of long run anticipated advantages, discounted (or capitalized) at a price which displays the certainty or uncertainty. Wealth or net current truly worth is the difference in between gross current truly worth and   the amount of capital financial investment required to obtain the advantages.”

What about a public sector organization the equity stock of which, being absolutely owned by the authorities, is not traded on stock sector? In such a circumstance, the goal of administration really should be to improve the current price of the stream of equity returns. Of system in figuring out the current price of stream of equity returns, an suitable lower price price has to be used. A equivalent observation may be built with respect to other organizations whose equity shares are possibly not traded or quite thinly traded.

From the previously mentioned clarification, a single detail is certain that the wealth maximization is a extended-expression strategy that emphasizes elevating the current price of the owner’s financial investment in a company   and the   implementation of tasks that will improve the sector price of the firm’s securities. This criterion, if used, fulfills the objections elevated in opposition to the earlier criterion of financial gain maximization. The manager also specials with the problem of uncertainty by getting into account the trade-off in between the different returns and linked ranges of threats. It also requires into account the payment of dividends to shareholders. All these ingredients of the wealth maximization objective are the end result of the financial investment, financing and dividend selections of the organization.

OTHER GOALS  OF Administration

The subject is additional complex by the actuality that administration may in exercise have other aims possibly alternatively of, or as effectively as, that of financial gain maximization. A few   choices are supplied under.

(a)Advancement: The maximization of financial gain does not necessarily involve a organization of massive measurement. Corporate ability, nonetheless, is normally a function of measurement and this may grow to be a administration objective. Non-financial gain building organisations, such as mutual assurance organizations and creating societies, where the financial gain motive cannot operate, normally undertake pure development as an objective.

(b)Hazard reduction: Several perhaps quite successful enterprises also have a substantial hazard of high-priced failure. Prospecting for oil, for case in point, is quite successful if a abundant strike is built but ruinous if the exploration proves abortive. It may, as a result, be a administration objective to guarantee survival by the avoidance of hazard, financial gain starting to be a secondary objective.

(c)Personalized aspirations: Persons who receive senior positions in
administration are most likely to be highly motivated toward their have occupation
aims. Critical aims for a manager may as a result be the
improvement of his have income, occupation prospective buyers or security. This may signify a wish for swift benefits which will stand to the rapid credit history of the manager concerned as in opposition to extra sound but longer expression financial gain building aims.

(d)Social objective: Some organisations undertake an altruistic social function as a administration, objective. Hence they may be anxious to increase operating conditions for their workers, to provide a wholesome item for their consumers or to steer clear of anti-social actions such as environmental pollution or unwanted advertising practices.

(e)Performance: Some enterprises, such as charities or public companies, have as a essential objective the provisions of a required support which is not supplied in the marketplace. A ideal administration objective for them is the provision of the support at minimum expense.

(f) Orderly liquidation: A organization will occasionally achieve a position where it is suitable for it to go into liquidation. This may be pressured on it by a crisis or a failure of its professional viability or it may be undertaken voluntarily for the reason that the functions of its authentic foundation have ceased to exist. In possibly circumstance, as soon as the choice has been taken, the objective of administration will be to operate the business right until its demise so as to stability the conflicts of interests of workers, shareholders and consumers, to fulfil contractual obligations, e.g. to pay lenders and debenture holders, and to deliver a tidy summary to all exceptional issues.

Where by a certain administration action has implications for extra than a single objective, a view ought to be taken as to the stability to be struck. For case in point, the objective of the maximization of financial gain may be in conflict with the objective of reducing hazard. The judgment to be built is subjective and, as a result, not prone to analysis while it is commonly built by   reference to some explicit or implicit over-all corporate objective.